Attorney - Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms
Good afternoon. Now, I learned about Attorney - Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms. Which may be very helpful to me and also you.
Hospice Fraud - A review For Employees, Whistleblowers, Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms
Hospice fraud in South Carolina and the United States is an increasing qoute as the estimate of hospice patients has exploded over the past few years. From 2004 to 2008, the estimate of patients receiving hospice care in the United States grew roughly 40% to nearly 1.5 million, and of the 2.5 million people who died in 2008, nearly one million were hospice patients. The wonderful majority of people receiving hospice care receive federal benefits from the federal government straight through the Medicare or Medicaid programs. The condition care providers who supply hospice services traditionally enroll in the Medicare and Medicaid programs in order to qualify to receive payments under these government programs for services rendered to Medicare and Medicaid eligible patients.
What I said. It just isn't the final outcome that the true about
Attorney. You look at this article for information on that want to know is
Attorney.
Attorney
While most hospice condition care organizations supply suitable and ethical treatment for their hospice patients, because hospice eligibility under Medicare and Medicaid involves clinical judgments which may ensue in the payments of large sums of money from the federal government, there are gigantic opportunities for fraudulent practices and false billing claims by unscrupulous hospice care providers. As modern federal hospice fraud obligation actions have demonstrated, the estimate of condition care clubs and individuals who are willing to try to defraud the Medicare and Medicaid hospice benefits programs is on the rise.
A modern example of hospice fraud captivating a South Carolina hospice is Southern Care, Inc., a hospice enterprise that in 2009 paid .7 million to decree an Fca case. The defendant operated hospices in 14 other states, too, including Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. The alleged frauds were that patients were not eligible for hospice, to wit, were not terminally ill, lack of documentation of terminal illnesses, and that the enterprise marketed to potential patients with the promise of free medications, supplies, and the provision of home condition aides. Southern Care also entered into a 5-year Corporate Integrity agreement with the Oig as part of the settlement. The qui tam relators received roughly million.
Understanding the Consequences of Hospice Fraud and Whistleblower Actions
U.S. And South Carolina consumers, including hospice patients and their family members, and condition care employees who are employed in the hospice industry, as well as their Sc lawyers and attorneys, should warn themselves with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and hospice fraud schemes that have industrialized over the country. Consumers need to safe themselves from unethical hospice providers, and hospice employees need to guard against knowingly or unwittingly participating in condition care fraud against the federal government because they may subject themselves to executive sanctions, including lengthy exclusions from working in an club which receives federal funds, gigantic civil monetary penalties and fines, and criminal sanctions, including incarceration. When a hospice employee discovers fraudulent conduct captivating Medicare or Medicaid billings or claims, the employee should not participate in such behavior, and it is imperative that the unlawful conduct be reported to law obligation and/or regulatory authorities. Not only does reporting such fraudulent Medicare or Medicaid practices shield the hospice employee from exposure to the foregoing administrative, civil and criminal sanctions, but hospice fraud whistleblowers may advantage financially under the repaymen provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on profit of the United States.
Types of Hospice Care Services
Hospice care is a type of condition care aid for patients who are terminally ill. Hospices also supply retain services for the families of terminally ill patients. This care includes corporal care and counseling. Hospice care is usually in case,granted by a collective agency or private enterprise beloved by Medicare and Medicaid. Hospice care is ready for all age groups, including children, adults, and the elderly who are in the final stages of life. The purpose of hospice is to supply care for the terminally ill patient and his or her family and not to cure the terminal illness.
If a patient qualifies for hospice care, the patient can receive curative and retain services, including nursing care, curative collective services, doctor services, counseling, homemaker services, and other types of services. The hospice patient will have a team of doctors, nurses, home condition aides, collective workers, counselors and trained volunteers to help the patient and his or her family members cope with the symptoms and consequences of the terminal illness. While many hospice patients and their families can receive hospice care in the relieve of their home, if the hospice patient's condition deteriorates, the patient can be transferred to a hospice facility, hospital, or nursing home to receive hospice care.
Hospice Care Statistics
The estimate of days that a patient receives hospice care is often referenced as the "length of stay" or "length of service." The length of aid is dependent on a estimate of dissimilar factors, including but not petite to, the type and stage of the disease, the quality of and passage to condition care providers before the hospice referral, and the timing of the hospice referral. In 2008, the mean length of stay for hospice patients was about 21 days, the mean length of stay was about 69 days, roughly 35% of hospice patients died or were discharged within 7 days of the hospice referral, and only about 12% of hospice patients survived longer than 180 days.
Most hospice care patients receive hospice care in private homes (40%). Other locations where hospice services are in case,granted are nursing homes (22%), residential facilities (6%), hospice patient facilities (21%), and acute care hospitals (10%). Hospice patients are generally the elderly, and hospice age group percentages are 34 years or less (1%), 35 - 64 years (16%), 65 - 74 years (16%), 75 - 84 years (29%), and over 85 years (38%). As for the terminal illness resulting in a hospice referral, cancer is the analysis for roughly 40% of hospice patients, followed by debility unspecified (15%), heart disease (12%), dementia (11%), lung disease (8%), stroke (4%) and kidney disease (3%). Medicare pays the great majority of hospice care expenses (84%), followed by private guarnatee (8%), Medicaid (5%), charity care (1%) and self pay (1%).
As of 2008, there were roughly 4,700 locations which were providing hospice care in the United States, which represented about a 50% increase over ten years. There were about 3,700 clubs and organizations which were providing hospice services in the United States. About half of the hospice care providers in the United States are for-profit organizations, and about half are non-profit organizations.
General summary of the Medicare and Medicaid Programs
In 1965, Congress established the Medicare agenda to supply condition guarnatee for the elderly and disabled. Payments from the Medicare agenda arise from the Medicare Trust fund, which is funded by government contributions and straight through payroll deductions from American workers. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Cms), previously known as the condition Care Financing supervision (Hcfa), is the federal agency within the United States agency of condition and Human Services (Hhs) that administers the Medicare agenda and works in partnership with state governments to administer Medicaid.
In 2007, Cms reorganized its ten geography-based field offices to a Consortia buildings based on the agency's key lines of business: Medicare condition plans, Medicare financial management, Medicare fee for aid operations, Medicaid and children's health, examine & certification and quality improvement. The Cms consortia consist of the following:
• Consortium for Medicare condition Plans Operations
• Consortium for Financial supervision and Fee for aid Operations
• Consortium for Medicaid and Children's condition Operations
• Consortium for quality revising and examine & Certification Operations
Each consortium is led by a Consortium Administrator (Ca) who serves as the Cms's national focal point in the field for their enterprise line. Each Ca is responsible for consistent implementation of Cms programs, course and advice over all ten regions for matters pertaining to their enterprise line. In increasing to accountability for a enterprise line, each Ca also serves as the Agency's senior supervision legal for two or three Regional Offices (Ros), representing the Cms Administrator in external matters and overseeing executive operations.
Much of the daily supervision and execution of the Medicare agenda is managed straight through private guarnatee clubs that compact with the Government. These private guarnatee companies, sometimes called "Medicare Carriers" or "Fiscal Intermediaries," are expensed with and responsible for accepting Medicare claims, determining coverage, and development payments from the Medicare Trust Fund. These carriers, including Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators (hereinafter "Pgba"), a agency of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina, operate pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395h and 1395u and rely on the good faith and rigorous representations of condition care providers when processing claims.
Over the past forty years, the Medicare agenda has enabled the elderly and disabled to accumulate needful curative services from curative providers throughout the United States. needful to the success of the Medicare agenda is the fundamental view that condition care providers accurately and authentically submit claims and bills to the Medicare Trust Fund only for those curative treatments or services that are legitimate, cheap and medically necessary, in full compliancy with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that curative providers not take advantage of their elderly and disabled patients.
The Medicaid agenda is ready only to clear low-income individuals and families who must meet eligibility requirements set forth by federal and state law. Each state sets its own guidelines concerning eligibility and services. Although administered by private states, the Medicaid agenda is funded primarily by the federal government. Medicaid does not pay money to patients; rather, it sends payments directly to the patient's condition care providers. Like Medicare, the Medicaid agenda depends on condition care providers to accurately and authentically submit claims and bills to agenda administrators only for those curative treatments or services that are legitimate, cheap and medically necessary, in full compliancy with all laws, regulations, rules, and conditions of participation, and, further, that curative providers not take advantage of their indigent patients.
Medicare & Medicaid Hospice Laws Which sway Sc Hospices
Hospice fraud occurs when hospice organizations, by and straight through their employees, agents and owners, knowingly violate the terms and conditions of the applicable Medicare and Medicaid hospice statutes, regulations, rules and conditions of participation. In order to be able to recognize hospice fraud, hospices, hospice patients, hospice employees and their attorneys and lawyers must know the Medicare laws and requirements relating to hospice care benefits.
Medicare's two main sources of authorization for hospice benefits are found in the collective protection Act and the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. The statutory provisions are primarily found at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395d, 1395e, 1395f(a)(7), 1395x(d)(d), and 1395y, and the regulatory provisions are found at 42 C.F.R. Part 418.
To be eligible for Medicare benefits for hospice care, the patient must be eligible for Medicare Part A and be terminally ill. 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. terminal illness is established when "the private has a curative analysis that his or her life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(3). The patient's doctor and the curative director of the hospice must guarantee in writing that the patient is "terminally ill." 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7); 42 C.F.R. § 418.20. After a patient's initial certification, Medicare provides for two ninety-day advantage periods followed by an unlimited estimate of sixty-day advantage periods. 42 U.S.C. § 1395d(a)(4). At the end of each ninety- or sixty-day period, the patient can be re-certified only if at that time he or she has less than six months to live if the illness runs its normal course. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(A). The written certification and re-certifications must be maintained in the patient's curative records. 42 C.F.R. § 418.23. A written plan of care must be established for each patient setting forth the types of hospice care services the patient is scheduled to receive, 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(B), and the hospice care has to be in case,granted in accordance with such plan of care. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(a)(7)(C); 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. Clinical records for each hospice patient must be maintained by the hospice, including plan of care, assessments, clinical notes, signed consideration of election, patient responses to medication and therapy, doctor certifications and re-certifications, outcome data, enlarge directives and doctor orders. 42 C.F.R. § 418.104.
The hospice must accumulate a written consideration of choice from the patient to elect to receive Medicare hospice benefits. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24. Importantly, once a patient has elected to receive hospice care benefits, the patient waives Medicare benefits for curative treatment for the terminal disease upon which is the admitting diagnosis. 42 C.F.R. § 418.24(d).
The hospice must designate an Interdisciplinary Group (Idg) or groups composed of individuals who work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56. The Idg members must supply the care and services offered by the hospice, and the group, in its entirety, must supervise the care and services. A registered nurse that is a member of the Idg must be designated to supply coordination of care and to ensure continuous evaluation of each patient's and family's needs and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. The interdisciplinary group must include, but is not petite to, the following superior and competent professionals: (i) A doctor of treatment or osteopathy (who is an employee or under compact with the hospice); (ii) A registered nurse; (iii) A collective worker; and, (iv) A pastoral or other counselor. 42 C.F.R. § 418.56.
The Medicare hospice regulations, at 42 C.F.R. § 418.200, summarize the requirements for hospice coverage in pertinent part as follows:
To be covered, hospice services must meet the following requirements. They must be cheap and needful for the palliation and supervision of the terminal illness as well as connected conditions. The private must elect hospice care in accordance with §418.24. A plan of care must be established and periodically reviewed by the attending physician, the curative director, and the interdisciplinary group of the hospice agenda as set forth in §418.56. That plan of care must be established before hospice care is provided. The services in case,granted must be consistent with the plan of care. A certification that the private is terminally ill must be completed as set forth in section §418.22.
The collective protection Act, at 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a), limits Medicare hospice benefits, providing in pertinent part as follows: "Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no payment may be made under part A or part B for any expenses incurred for items or services-... (C) in the case of hospice care, which are not cheap and needful for the palliation or supervision of terminal illness...." 42 C.F.R. § 418.50 (hospice care must be "reasonable and needful for the palliation and supervision of terminal illness"). Palliative care is defined in the regulations as "patient and family-centered care that optimizes quality of life by anticipating, preventing, and treating suffering. Palliative care throughout the continuum of illness involves addressing physical, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual needs and to facilitate patient autonomy, passage to information, and choice." 42 C.F.R. § 418.3.
Medicare pays hospice agencies a daily rate for each day a beneficiary is enrolled in the hospice advantage and receives hospice care. The daily payments are made regardless of the estimate of services furnished on a given day and are intended to cover costs that the hospice incurs in furnishing services identified in the patient's plan of care. There are four levels of payments which are made based on the estimate of care required to meet beneficiary and family needs. 42 C.F.R. § 418.302; Cms Hospice Fact Sheet, November 2009. These four levels, and the corresponding 2010 daily rates, are as follows: habit home care (2.91); continuous home care (4.10); patient respite care (7.83); and, normal patient care (5.74).
The combination yearly cap per patient in 2009 was ,014.50. This cap is considered by adjusting the former hospice patient cap of ,500, set in 1984, by the buyer Price Index. See Cms Internet-Only manual 100-04, chapter 11, section 80.2; 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i); 42 C.F.R. § 418.309. The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at chapter 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 80.2, entitled "Cap on wide Hospice Reimbursement," provides in pertinent part as follows: "Any payments in excess of the cap must be refunded by the hospice."
Hospice patients are responsible for Medicare co-insurance payments for drugs and respite care, and the hospice may charge the patient for these co-insurance payments. However, the co-insurance payments for drugs are petite to the lesser of or 5% of the cost of the drugs to the hospice, and the co-insurance payments for respite care are generally 5% of the payment made by Medicare for such services. 42 C.F.R. § 418.400.
The Medicare and Medicaid programs wish institutional condition care providers, including hospice organizations, to file an enrollment application in order to qualify to receive the programs' benefits. As part of these enrollment applications, the hospice providers guarantee that they will comply with Medicare and Medicaid laws, regulations, and agenda instructions, and further guarantee that they understand that payment of a claim by Medicare and Medicaid is conditioned upon the claim and fundamental transaction complying with such agenda laws and requirements. The Medicare Enrollment Application which hospice providers must execute, Form Cms-855A, states in part as follows: "I agree to abide by the Medicare laws, regulations and agenda instructions that apply to this provider. The Medicare laws, regulations, and agenda instructions are ready straight through the Medicare contractor. I understand that payment of a claim by Medicare is conditioned upon the claim and the fundamental transaction complying with such laws, regulations, and agenda instructions (including, but not petite to, the Federal Aks and Stark laws), and on the provider's compliancy with all applicable conditions of participation in Medicare."
Hospices are generally required to bill Medicare on a monthly basis. See the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, at chapter 11 - Processing Hospice Claims, in Section 90 - Frequency of Billing. Hospices generally file their hospice Medicare claims with their Fiscal Intermediary or Medicare Carrier pursuant to the Cms Claims manual Form Cms 1450 (sometime also called a Form Ub-04 or Form Ub-92), whether in paper or electronic form. These claim forms consist of representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of needful data may serve as the basis for civil monetary penalties and criminal convictions; (2) submission of the claim constitutes certification that the billing data is true, spoton and complete; (3) the submitter did not knowingly or recklessly disregard or misrepresent or conceal material facts; (4) all required doctor certifications and re-certifications are on file; (5) all required patient signatures are on file; and, (6) for Medicaid purposes, the submitter understands that because payment and delight of this claim will be from Federal and State funds, any false statements, documents, or concealment of a material fact are subject to prosecution under applicable Federal or State Laws.
Hospices must also file with Cms an yearly cost and data report of Medicare payments received. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(i)(3); 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)(d)(4). The yearly hospice cost and data reports, Form Cms 1984-99, consist of representations and certifications which state in pertinent part that: (1) misrepresentations or falsifications of data contained in the cost report may be punishable by criminal, civil and executive actions, including fines and/or imprisonment; (2) if any services identified in the report were the goods of a direct or indirect kickback or were otherwise illegal, then criminal, civil and executive actions may result, including fines and/or imprisonment; (3) the report is a true, spoton and faultless statement prepared from the books and records of the provider in accordance with applicable instructions, except as noted; and, (4) the signing officer is well-known with the laws and regulations concerning the provision of condition care services and that the services identified in this cost report were in case,granted in compliancy with such laws and regulations.
Hospice Anti-Fraud obligation Statutes
There are a estimate of federal criminal, civil and executive obligation provisions set forth in the Medicare statutes which are aimed at preventing fraudulent conduct, including hospice fraud, and which help verbalize agenda integrity and compliance. Some of the more prominent obligation provisions of the Medicare statutes consist of the following: 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (Criminal fraud and anti-kickback penalties); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a and 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-8 (Civil monetary penalties for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7 (Administrative exclusions from participation in Medicare/Medicaid programs for fraud); 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-4 (Administrative subpoena power for the Comptroller General).
Other criminal obligation provisions which are used to combat Medicare and Medicaid fraud, including hospice fraud, consist of the following: 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (General condition care fraud criminal statute); 21 U.S.C. §§ 353, 333 (Prescription Drug Marketing Act); 18 U.S.C. § 669 (Theft or Embezzlement in association with condition Care); 18 U.S.C. § 1035 (False statements relating to condition Care); 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Aiding and Abetting); 18 U.S.C. § 3 (Accessory after the Fact); 18 U.S.C. § 4 (Misprision of a Felony); 18 U.S.C. § 286 (Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 287 (False, Fictitious or Fraudulent Claims); 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Criminal Conspiracy); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements); 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (Money Laundering); 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (Money Laundering); and, 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("Rico")).
The False Claims Act (Fca)
Hospice fraud whistleblowers may advantage financially under the repaymen provisions of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3732, by bringing false claims suits, also known as qui tam or whistleblower suits, against their employers on profit of the United States. The plaintiff in a hospice fraud whistleblower suit is also known as a relator. The most common Fca provisions upon which hospice fraud qui tam or whistleblower relators rely are found in 31 U.S.C. § 3729: (A) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; (B) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false report or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim; (C) conspires to commit a violation of subparagraph (A), (B), (D), (E), (F), or (G);..., and, (G) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false report or statement material to an obligation to pay or forward money or property to the Government, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or forward money or property to the Government.... There is no requirement to prove specific intent to defraud. Rather, it is only needful to prove actual knowledge of the false claims, false statements, or false records, or the defendant's deliberate indifference or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b).
The Fca anti-retaliation provision protects the hospice whistleblower from retaliation from the hospice when the employee (or a contractor) "is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment" for taking operation to try to stop the fraudulent activity. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). A hospice employee's relief includes reinstatement, 2 times the estimate of back pay, interest on the back pay, and compensation for any extra damages sustained as a ensue of the discrimination or retaliation, including litigation costs and cheap attorneys' fees.
A Sc hospice fraud Fca whistleblower would initially file a disclosure statement, complaint and supporting documents with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Columbia, South Carolina, and the Us Attorney General. After the disclosures are filed, a federal court complaint can be filed. The Sc agency where the frauds occurred, the relator's residence, and the defendant residence, will decree which agency the case will be assigned. There are eleven federal court divisions in South Carolina. Once the case has been filed, the government has 60 days to decree whether or not to intervene. While this time, federal government investigators placed in South Carolina will study the claims. If the case complicated Medicaid, Sc Medicaid fraud unit investigators will likely become complicated as well. If the government intervenes in the case, the U.S. Attorney for South Carolina is usually the lead attorney. If the government does not intervene, the relator's Sc attorney will prosecute the case. In South Carolina, expect a qui tam case to take one to two years to get to trial.
Tips on Recognizing Hospice Fraud Schemes
The Hhs Office of Inspector normal (Oig) has issued extra Fraud Alerts for fraudulent and abusive practices of hospices. U.S. And South Carolina hospices, patients, hospice employees and whistleblowers, their attorneys and lawyers, should be well-known with these hospice fraud practices. Tips on recognizing hospice frauds in South Carolina and the U.S. Are:
• A hospice gift free goods or goods at below store value to induce a nursing home to refer patients to the hospice.
• False representations in a hospice's Medicare/Medicaid enrollment form.
• A hospice paying "room and board" payments to the nursing home in amounts in excess of what the nursing home would have received directly from Medicaid had the patient not been enrolled in the hospice.
• False statements in a hospice's claim form (Cms Forms 1450, Ub-04 or Ub-92).
• A hospice falsely billing for services that were not cheap or needful for the palliation of the symptoms of a terminally ill patient.
• A hospice paying amounts to the nursing home for "additional" services that Medicaid considered included in its room and board payment to the hospice.
• A hospice paying above fair store value for "additional" non-core services which Medicaid does not consider to be included in its room and board payments to the nursing home.
• A hospice referring patients to a nursing home to induce the nursing home to refer its patients to the hospice.
•A hospice providing free (or below fair store value) care to nursing home patients, for whom the nursing home is receiving Medicare payment under the skilled nursing installation benefit, with the prospect that after the patient exhausts the skilled nursing installation benefit, the patient will receive hospice services from that hospice.
• A hospice providing staff at its cost to the nursing home to achieve duties that otherwise would be performed by the nursing home.
• Incomplete or no written Plan of Care was established or reviewed at specific intervals.
• Plan of Care did not consist of an evaluation of needs.
• Fraudulent statements in a hospice's cost report to the government.
• consideration of choice was not obtained or was fraudulently obtained.
• Rn supervisory visits were not made for home condition aide services.
• Certification or Re-certification of terminal illness was not obtained or was fraudulently obtained.
• No Plan of care was included for bereavement services.
• Fraudulent billing for upcoded levels of hospice care.
• Hospice did not conduct a self-assessment of quality and care provided.
• Clinical records were not maintained for every patient.
• Interdisciplinary group did not narrate and modernize the plan of care for each patient.
Recent Hospice Fraud obligation Cases
The Doj and U.S. Attorney's Offices have been active in enforcing hospice fraud cases.
In 2009, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals placed an Fca lawsuit by paying .8 million to the federal government. The defendant assertedly failed to accumulate written certifications of terminal illness for a estimate of its patients.
In 2006, Odyssey Healthcare, a national hospice provider, paid .9 million to decree a qui tam suit for false claims under the Fca. The hospice fraud allegations were generally that Odyssey billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients when they were not terminally ill and ineligible for Medicare hospice benefits. A Corporate Integrity agreement was also a part of the settlement. The hospice fraud qui tam relator received .3 million for blowing the whistle on the defendant.
In 2005, Faith Hospice, Inc., placed claims an Fca claim for 0,000. The hospice fraud allegations were generally that Faith Hospice billed Medicare for providing hospice care to patients more than half of whom were not terminally ill.
In 2005, Home Hospice of North Texas placed an Fca claim for 0,000 concerning allegations of fraudulently billing Medicare for ineligible hospice patients.
In 2000, Michigan osteopath Donald Dreyfuss, who pleaded guilty to criminal fraud charges, including violation of the Aks for receiving illegal kickbacks from a hospice for recommending the hospice to the staff of his nursing home, placed an Fca suit for million.
Conclusion
Hospice fraud is a growing qoute in South Carolina and throughout the United States. South Carolina hospice patients, hospice employees, and their Sc lawyers and attorneys, should be well-known with the basics of the hospice care industry, hospice eligibility under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and typical hospice fraud schemes. Hospice organizations should take steps to ensure full compliancy with Medicare/Medicaid hospice billing requirements to avoid hospice fraud allegations and Fca litigation.
© 2010 Joseph P. Griffith, Jr.
I hope you will get new knowledge about
Attorney. Where you possibly can offer utilization in your daily life. And most importantly, your reaction is passed about
Attorney.
